SSL Report: westfalen-weser-netz.emt.mak-vnb.as4-mako-service.de (195.35.74.199)
Assessed on:  Sat, 14 Jun 2025 07:52:31 UTC | Clear cache

Due to a recently discovered bug in Apple's code, your browser is exposed to MITM attacks. Click here for more information.

Summary
Overall Rating
T
If trust issues are ignored: B
0
20
40
60
80
100
Certificate
 
Protocol Support
 
Key Exchange
 
Cipher Strength
 

Visit our documentation page for more information, configuration guides, and books. Known issues are documented here.
This server's certificate is not trusted, see below for details.
This server's certificate is not trusted by major browsers. MORE INFO »
This server's certificate chain is incomplete. Grade capped to B.
HTTP request to this server failed, see below for details.
This server does not support TLS 1.3.  MORE INFO »
This site works only in browsers with SNI support.
Certificate #1: EC 256 bits (SHA256withECDSA)
Server Key and Certificate #1
Subject Westfalen-Weser-Netz.EMT.MAK-VNB
Fingerprint SHA256: 440f43d2e0e83707457419fe0cc97e1118bc70996ab3c94ddbe81e430f415cfb
Pin SHA256: vGo7org+UTJ5G8086JW1HknNn6Oh6ampfK5vuSu7pjk=
Common names Westfalen-Weser-Netz.EMT.MAK-VNB
Alternative names Westfalen-Weser-Netz.EMT.MAK-VNB.as4-mako-service.de
Serial Number 00ea342a391bf5690c
Valid from Fri, 27 Oct 2023 04:28:35 UTC
Valid until Mon, 27 Oct 2025 04:28:35 UTC (expires in 4 months and 12 days)
Key EC 256 bits
Weak key (Debian) No
Issuer Atos-Smart-Grid.CA
Signature algorithm SHA256withECDSA
Extended Validation No
Certificate Transparency No
OCSP Must Staple No
Revocation information CRL
CRL: http://crl.sm-pki.atos.net/Atos-Smart-Grid.CA.4.crl
Revocation status Unchecked (only trusted certificates can be checked)
DNS CAA No (more info)
Trusted No   NOT TRUSTED (Why?)
Mozilla  Apple  Android  Java  Windows 


Additional Certificates (if supplied)
Certificates provided 2 (2090 bytes)
Chain issues Incomplete
#2
Subject Atos-Smart-Grid.CA
Fingerprint SHA256: dc64810f17c26ac8108588239af3030c031cb0a0dd2b38091de0a0106a8e6fd7
Pin SHA256: KvLQIoac3jdvC/ESCwVWjpdlkgZEg9Xtr83uJJJ8HWk=
Valid until Thu, 01 Jul 2027 23:59:59 UTC (expires in 2 years)
Key EC 256 bits
Issuer SM-Root.CA
Signature algorithm SHA384withECDSA


Certification Paths
No trust paths available
Issuer unknown, or intermediate certificate(s) missing.
No trust paths available
Issuer unknown, or intermediate certificate(s) missing.
No trust paths available
Issuer unknown, or intermediate certificate(s) missing.
No trust paths available
Issuer unknown, or intermediate certificate(s) missing.
No trust paths available
Issuer unknown, or intermediate certificate(s) missing.

Click here to expand

Certificate #2: EC 256 bits (SHA256withECDSA)
Server Key and Certificate #1
Subject EnBW.EMT.MAK-LIF
Fingerprint SHA256: 25bb4cc0cb79da9c139c5be9feb3297b8b9353a4d155eb5ddfe8af2737e8ff55
Pin SHA256: Q4l8VuzkumdVBW3DcPej+558I3Dllhdt6SEthBTJ0CE=
Common names EnBW.EMT.MAK-LIF
Alternative names EnBW.EMT.MAK-LIF.as4-mako-service.de   MISMATCH
Serial Number 00d732ee1f8b661900
Valid from Mon, 25 Sep 2023 14:45:57 UTC
Valid until Thu, 25 Sep 2025 14:45:57 UTC (expires in 3 months and 10 days)
Key EC 256 bits
Weak key (Debian) No
Issuer Atos-Smart-Grid.CA
Signature algorithm SHA256withECDSA
Extended Validation No
Certificate Transparency No
OCSP Must Staple No
Revocation information CRL
CRL: http://crl.sm-pki.atos.net/Atos-Smart-Grid.CA.4.crl
Revocation status Unchecked (only trusted certificates can be checked)
Trusted No   NOT TRUSTED (Why?)
Mozilla  Apple  Android  Java  Windows 


Additional Certificates (if supplied)
Certificates provided 2 (2040 bytes)
Chain issues Incomplete
#2
Subject Atos-Smart-Grid.CA
Fingerprint SHA256: dc64810f17c26ac8108588239af3030c031cb0a0dd2b38091de0a0106a8e6fd7
Pin SHA256: KvLQIoac3jdvC/ESCwVWjpdlkgZEg9Xtr83uJJJ8HWk=
Valid until Thu, 01 Jul 2027 23:59:59 UTC (expires in 2 years)
Key EC 256 bits
Issuer SM-Root.CA
Signature algorithm SHA384withECDSA


Certification Paths
No trust paths available
Issuer unknown, or intermediate certificate(s) missing.
No trust paths available
Issuer unknown, or intermediate certificate(s) missing.
No trust paths available
Issuer unknown, or intermediate certificate(s) missing.
No trust paths available
Issuer unknown, or intermediate certificate(s) missing.
No trust paths available
Issuer unknown, or intermediate certificate(s) missing.

Click here to expand

Click here to expand

Configuration
Protocols
TLS 1.3 No
TLS 1.2 Yes*
TLS 1.1 No
TLS 1.0 No
SSL 3 No
SSL 2 No
(*) Experimental: Server negotiated using No-SNI


Cipher Suites
# TLS 1.2 (suites in server-preferred order)
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (0xc02b)   ECDH secp384r1 (eq. 7680 bits RSA)   FS 128
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (0xc02c)   ECDH secp384r1 (eq. 7680 bits RSA)   FS 256
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 (0xc023)   ECDH secp384r1 (eq. 7680 bits RSA)   FS   WEAK 128
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384 (0xc024)   ECDH secp384r1 (eq. 7680 bits RSA)   FS   WEAK 256


Handshake Simulation
Android 4.4.2 EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp384r1  FS
Android 5.0.0 EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp384r1  FS
Android 6.0 EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Android 7.0 EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Android 8.0 EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Android 8.1 EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Android 9.0 EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
BingPreview Jan 2015 EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp384r1  FS
Chrome 49 / XP SP3 Server sent fatal alert: handshake_failure
Chrome 69 / Win 7  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Chrome 70 / Win 10 EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Chrome 80 / Win 10  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Firefox 31.3.0 ESR / Win 7 EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Firefox 47 / Win 7  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Firefox 49 / XP SP3 EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Firefox 62 / Win 7  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Firefox 73 / Win 10  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Googlebot Feb 2018 EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
IE 11 / Win 7  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
IE 11 / Win 8.1  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
IE 11 / Win Phone 8.1  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
IE 11 / Win Phone 8.1 Update  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
IE 11 / Win 10  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Edge 15 / Win 10  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Edge 16 / Win 10  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Edge 18 / Win 10  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Edge 13 / Win Phone 10  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Java 8u161 EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Java 11.0.3 EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Java 12.0.1 EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
OpenSSL 1.0.1l  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp384r1  FS
OpenSSL 1.0.2s  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
OpenSSL 1.1.0k  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
OpenSSL 1.1.1c  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Safari 6 / iOS 6.0.1 EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Safari 7 / iOS 7.1  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Safari 7 / OS X 10.9  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Safari 8 / iOS 8.4  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Safari 8 / OS X 10.10  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Safari 9 / iOS 9  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Safari 9 / OS X 10.11  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Safari 10 / iOS 10  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Safari 10 / OS X 10.12  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Safari 12.1.2 / MacOS 10.14.6 Beta  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Safari 12.1.1 / iOS 12.3.1  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Apple ATS 9 / iOS 9  R EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS
Yahoo Slurp Jan 2015 EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp384r1  FS
YandexBot Jan 2015 EC 256 (SHA256)   TLS 1.2 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp384r1  FS
# Not simulated clients (Protocol mismatch)
Android 2.3.7   No SNI 2 Protocol mismatch (not simulated)
Android 4.0.4 Protocol mismatch (not simulated)
Android 4.1.1 Protocol mismatch (not simulated)
Android 4.2.2 Protocol mismatch (not simulated)
Android 4.3 Protocol mismatch (not simulated)
Baidu Jan 2015 Protocol mismatch (not simulated)
IE 6 / XP   No FS 1   No SNI 2 Protocol mismatch (not simulated)
IE 7 / Vista Protocol mismatch (not simulated)
IE 8 / XP   No FS 1   No SNI 2 Protocol mismatch (not simulated)
IE 8-10 / Win 7  R Protocol mismatch (not simulated)
IE 10 / Win Phone 8.0 Protocol mismatch (not simulated)
Java 6u45   No SNI 2 Protocol mismatch (not simulated)
Java 7u25 Protocol mismatch (not simulated)
OpenSSL 0.9.8y Protocol mismatch (not simulated)
Safari 5.1.9 / OS X 10.6.8 Protocol mismatch (not simulated)
Safari 6.0.4 / OS X 10.8.4  R Protocol mismatch (not simulated)

Click here to expand

(1) Clients that do not support Forward Secrecy (FS) are excluded when determining support for it.
(2) No support for virtual SSL hosting (SNI). Connects to the default site if the server uses SNI.
(3) Only first connection attempt simulated. Browsers sometimes retry with a lower protocol version.
(R) Denotes a reference browser or client, with which we expect better effective security.
(All) We use defaults, but some platforms do not use their best protocols and features (e.g., Java 6 & 7, older IE).
(All) Certificate trust is not checked in handshake simulation, we only perform TLS handshake.


Protocol Details
Secure Renegotiation Supported
Secure Client-Initiated Renegotiation No
Insecure Client-Initiated Renegotiation No
BEAST attack Mitigated server-side (more info)  
POODLE (SSLv3) No, SSL 3 not supported (more info)
POODLE (TLS) No (more info)
Zombie POODLE Unknown (more info)
GOLDENDOODLE Unknown (more info)
OpenSSL 0-Length Unknown (more info)
Sleeping POODLE Unknown (more info)
Downgrade attack prevention Unknown (requires support for at least two protocols, excl. SSL2)
SSL/TLS compression No
RC4 No
Heartbeat (extension) No
Heartbleed (vulnerability) No (more info)
Ticketbleed (vulnerability) No (more info)
OpenSSL CCS vuln. (CVE-2014-0224) No (more info)
OpenSSL Padding Oracle vuln.
(CVE-2016-2107)
No (more info)
ROBOT (vulnerability) No (more info)
Forward Secrecy Yes (with most browsers)   ROBUST (more info)
ALPN No
NPN No
Session resumption (caching) Unknown
Session resumption (tickets) No
OCSP stapling No
Strict Transport Security (HSTS) Unknown (failed HTTP request?)
HSTS Preloading Not in: Chrome  Edge  Firefox  IE 
Public Key Pinning (HPKP) Unknown (failed HTTP request?)
Public Key Pinning Report-Only Unknown (failed HTTP request?)
Public Key Pinning (Static) No (more info)
Long handshake intolerance No
TLS extension intolerance No
TLS version intolerance TLS 2.152 
Incorrect SNI alerts No
Uses common DH primes No, DHE suites not supported
DH public server param (Ys) reuse No, DHE suites not supported
ECDH public server param reuse No
Supported Named Groups secp256r1, secp384r1, brainpoolP256r1, brainpoolP384r1, brainpoolP512r1 (Server has no preference)
SSL 2 handshake compatibility No


HTTP Requests
1 https://westfalen-weser-netz.emt.mak-vnb.as4-mako-service.de/  (Request failed)


Miscellaneous
Test date Sat, 14 Jun 2025 07:51:28 UTC
Test duration 62.886 seconds
HTTP status code Request failed
HTTP server signature Unknown
Server hostname -


Why is my certificate not trusted?

There are many reasons why a certificate may not be trusted. The exact problem is indicated on the report card in bright red. The problems fall into three categories:

  1. Invalid certificate
  2. Invalid configuration
  3. Unknown Certificate Authority

1. Invalid certificate

A certificate is invalid if:

2. Invalid configuration

In some cases, the certificate chain does not contain all the necessary certificates to connect the web server certificate to one of the root certificates in our trust store. Less commonly, one of the certificates in the chain (other than the web server certificate) will have expired, and that invalidates the entire chain.

3. Unknown Certificate Authority

In order for trust to be established, we must have the root certificate of the signing Certificate Authority in our trust store. SSL Labs does not maintain its own trust store; instead we use the store maintained by Mozilla.

If we mark a web site as not trusted, that means that the average web user's browser will not trust it either. For certain special groups of users, such web sites can still be secure. For example, if you can securely verify that a self-signed web site is operated by a person you trust, then you can trust that self-signed web site too. Or, if you work for an organisation that manages its own trust, and you have their own root certificate already embedded in your browser. Such special cases do not work for the general public, however, and this is what we indicate on our report card.

4. Interoperability issues

In some rare cases trust cannot be established because of interoperability issues between our code and the code or configuration running on the server. We manually review such cases, but if you encounter such an issue please feel free to contact us. Such problems are very difficult to troubleshoot and you may be able to provide us with information that might help us determine the root cause.

SSL Report v2.4.0